-->
发表于2024-06-15
Nation, Governance, and Modernity in China pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024
Review
"Tsin's book is well organized, refreshingly concise, and... highly readable " - Journal of Asian Studies "In this elegantly written and meticulously researched study, Tsin uses a social history of early twentieth-century Canton to explore the meaning and mechanisms of the political culture of modernity. One of the book's great strengths is Tsin's success in bringing social-historical and theoretical analyses together, using one to illuminate the other." - Journal of Interdisciplinary History --This text refers to the Paperback edition.
Review
“For researchers carrying up-to-date toolkits into the Chinese past, Tsin’s judicious analysis will be a model of clarity in exposition as well as a guide to the formation of China modernist discourses on national and social revolution.”—Canadian Journal of History
“Tsin’s book is well organized, refreshingly concise, and . . . highly readable.”—Journal of Asian Studies
“In this elegantly written and meticulously researched study, Tsin uses a social history of early 20th-century Canton to explore the meaning and mechanisms of the political culture of modernity. One of the book’s great strengths is Tsin’s success in bringing social-historical and theoretical analyses together, using one to illuminate the other.” —Journal of Interdisciplinary History
Michael T. W. Tsin is Associate Professor of Chinese History at Columbia University.
重点看了工人的部分。国家在民国初期试图发展一个有利于建构国家合法性的公民社会,然而“社会“逐渐超出了国家控制,并且显现出内斗的特征。对于国家-“社会“关系提供了很好的反思。但是也留下了很多问题没有解决。
评分Sympathize with what the author tried to do here, but ambivalent about the results. For a doctoral dissertation, it's not bad.
评分重点看了工人的部分。国家在民国初期试图发展一个有利于建构国家合法性的公民社会,然而“社会“逐渐超出了国家控制,并且显现出内斗的特征。对于国家-“社会“关系提供了很好的反思。但是也留下了很多问题没有解决。
评分Nationalism in practice。“社会”和现代的建构。广州晚清至国民革命前的历史。有点城市建设的内容,但偏重商人协会资本家、工人这两个阶级作为“现代”的表征,以及他们和政治精英的关系,联合和冲突。几次大罢工和广州商团事变,KMT作为当时的革命党怎么样倒向工人作为“社会”整体的设想,而怎样因为征税与商人发生激烈冲突。|| 我经常暗自羡慕历史学家能够在不同层次和方向和事情上灵活征引闪转,有时又不免埋怨理论只是一个把各种事情塞进叙述的框而已,太松散了。。。
评分广州的地方史,经过西方现代性、大卫哈维的空间理论与福柯的治理理论的点化,确是有不少启发性,但也正因囿于理论,又常有削足适履之感,20世纪前三十年的广州仅用现代/非现代二元论的眼光来分析是否合适?想起加拿大某晚清历史著作大用福柯而被痛批的故事来了……不过参考文献的确使我受益匪浅
评分
评分
评分
评分
Nation, Governance, and Modernity in China pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024