图书标签: 历史 女性研究 海外中国研究 中国 DorothyKo 女性 文化研究 缠足
发表于2024-06-15
Cinderella's Sisters pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024
The history of footbinding is full of contradictions and unexpected turns. The practice originated in the dance culture of China's medieval court and spread to gentry families, brothels, maid's quarters, and peasant households. Conventional views of footbinding as patriarchal oppression often neglect its complex history and the incentives of the women involved. This revisionist history, elegantly written and meticulously researched, presents a fascinating new picture of the practice from its beginnings in the tenth century to its demise in the twentieth century. Neither condemning nor defending foot-binding, Dorothy Ko debunks many myths and misconceptions about its origins, development, and eventual end, exploring in the process the entanglements of male power and female desires during the practice's thousand-year history. "Cinderella's Sisters" argues that rather than stemming from sexual perversion, men's desire for bound feet was connected to larger concerns such as cultural nostalgia, regional rivalries, and claims of male privilege. Nor were women hapless victims, the author contends. Ko describes how women - those who could afford it - bound their own and their daughters' feet to signal their high status and self-respect. Femininity, like the binding of feet, was associated with bodily labor and domestic work, and properly bound feet and beautifully made shoes both required exquisite skills and technical knowledge passed from generation to generation. Throughout her narrative, Ko deftly wields methods of social history, literary criticism, material culture studies, and the history of the body and fashion to illustrate how a practice that began as embodied lyricism - as a way to live as the poets imagined - ended up being an exercise in excess and folly.
高彦颐,(Dorothy Ko) 美国斯坦福大学国际关系学学士、东亚历史系博士,专攻明清社会史及比较妇女史。曾任教加州大学圣地亚哥分校及新泽西州立罗格斯大学历史及妇女研究系,现为纽约哥伦比亚大学巴纳德分校历史系教授。近作有《步步生莲:绣鞋与缠足文物》(Every Step a Lotus:Shoes for BoundFeet)及《闺塾师:明末清初江南的才女文化》(TeaeheFS of the Inner Chambers:Women andCulture in Seventeenth—Century China)等书。
之前读的补标,很喜欢这本书。看了其他一些书评说作者过度否定反对缠足的正面意义,但是我觉得作者并没有这样做。因为反对缠足、鼓励放足这样的运动已经得到了大部分史学家的关注和肯定,而作者仅仅是想去填补这其中对于缠足甚至主动缠足的女性的探讨和研究。发展缠足文化的是男性,发起女性解放运动的仍然是男性,而故事里的女性在历史里被遮蔽了。难道我们不该去听听故事里女性的声音吗(就算是一味妥协)?作者的书无疑为缠足和放足史增添了许多层次和复杂性
评分之前读的补标,很喜欢这本书。看了其他一些书评说作者过度否定反对缠足的正面意义,但是我觉得作者并没有这样做。因为反对缠足、鼓励放足这样的运动已经得到了大部分史学家的关注和肯定,而作者仅仅是想去填补这其中对于缠足甚至主动缠足的女性的探讨和研究。发展缠足文化的是男性,发起女性解放运动的仍然是男性,而故事里的女性在历史里被遮蔽了。难道我们不该去听听故事里女性的声音吗(就算是一味妥协)?作者的书无疑为缠足和放足史增添了许多层次和复杂性
评分body technology
评分同时参照着看看。
评分读了一篇中文译本的书评,受了些误导,以为作者是在强调女性在缠足传统中的主动权,而淡化了女性受害的实质。其实作者只是为了说明历史不会像教科书里写的那样齐整、同质。历史一定是杂乱的。在每一段突显“进步”的大型叙事下,一定有无数代表“反动”的剧情。被高歌称颂的“反”缠足运动中,其实充满了矛盾、反复、虚假,和不久即被官方叙事淹没的声音。
“缠足”这一话题产生了多久就谈论了多久,但无非都以谴责封建思想对妇女的压制为主,而高彦颐以不同的视角给我们呈现了一部缠足史,展现了不同的内涵。在这部书中,女性的声音没有被埋没,女性被真正的作为一个话语主体而呈现出来。 “玉足三寸波澜显,青瓦一片苔痕见”,女...
评分“缠足”这一话题产生了多久就谈论了多久,但无非都以谴责封建思想对妇女的压制为主,而高彦颐以不同的视角给我们呈现了一部缠足史,展现了不同的内涵。在这部书中,女性的声音没有被埋没,女性被真正的作为一个话语主体而呈现出来。 “玉足三寸波澜显,青瓦一片苔痕见”,女...
评分高彦颐对材料的解读水平真的让人叹为观止。无论是近代反缠足知识分子留下的议论,充满争议的《采菲录》,还是明清时期文人的笔记和文学作品,高对文字材料建构知识、影响观念、反映作者态度等等各个角度的分析都很到位。历史学家还是需要学会一些文学批判的套路的。唯一的遗憾...
评分在所有中国传统习俗中,缠足也许是最难以为现代人所接受和理解的:它被普遍视为一项令国人难以启齿的尴尬遗产,即使是传统文化的坚定拥护者,也不会为之辩护,更不用说倡导延续这一旧俗了。人们对缠足有着鲜明的道德判断——它无论如何不能算是一项“好”的传统,最好不要去提...
Cinderella's Sisters pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024