图书标签: 杜赞奇 历史 海外中国研究 满洲 满洲国 殖民地 民族主义 Manchukuo
发表于2024-06-15
Sovereignty and Authenticity pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024
In this powerful and provocative book, Prasenjit Duara uses the case of Manchukuo, the Japanese puppet state in northeast China from 1932-1945, to explore how such antinomies as imperialism and nationalism, modernity and tradition, and governmentality and exploitation interacted in the post-World War I period. His study of Manchukuo, which had a population of 40 million and was three times the area of Japan, catalyzes a broader understanding of new global trends that characterized much of the twentieth century. Asking why Manchukuo so desperately sought to appear sovereign, Duara examines the cultural and political resources it mobilized to make claims of sovereignty. He argues that Manchukuo, as a transparently constructed "nation-state," offers a unique historical laboratory for examining the utilization and transformation of circulating global forces mediated by the "East Asian modern." Sovereignty and AUthenticity not only shows how Manchukuo drew technologies of modern nationbuilding from China and Japan, but it provides a window into how some of these techniques and processes were obscured or naturalized in the more successful East Asian nation-states. With its sweepingly original theoretical and comparative perspectives on nationalism and imperialism, this book will be essential reading for all those interested in contemporary history.
立论太稀奇古怪,所谓的”本真性“也是云遮雾罩地把一些不相干的东西糅合成为所谓的民族思潮,国家主权与文化本真性在杜赞奇这里不自觉地打了个等号。但是使用的材料都不在一个对话平面上,居民的民族成分纷繁,因此想要推出的结论变成杜赞奇的臆测。问题在于”主权“究竟是满洲国的整体抑或主动的诉求,还是一个外在强加的外壳,这一点从本质上决定它是否仍然是”殖民地化“。杜赞奇试图希望在中国民族主义框架之外看待满洲国问题,但是他提到的宗教与地方乃至女性,它们本身就是源自中国传统,非但不能划清界限,反而内在地反叛了杜赞奇结论。【主权;满洲国;东亚;现代性】
评分what can I really get apart from the argument??? (每次阅读杜赞奇之后的疑问(可能还是我蠢
评分还没想好对这本书的看法.......不过的确是荜路兰缕,对而后几年的博士论文都有影响。
评分满洲国作为民族主义为内核的帝国主义,是如何借由本真性政体的运作稳固其政权的(带有奉献精神的女性、象征原始的鄂伦春边疆以及建构地方性的乡土小说)。作者层层论述的方式值得学习,注重揭示权力运作的过程(尤其是理念与实践的错位),因而案例偏重于细节的展现。个人对于“东亚现代性”的概念仍有不少困惑,究竟基于怎样的坐标系呢?每一章挑选中、日、满洲国的案例来论证也显得单薄呀。
评分In East Asian modernity, the relationship between both cultural and spatial authenticity and sovereignty was manifested by the transformation of “globally circulating concepts and practices of governmentality and fascistic mobilization, nationality, civilization and womanhood, indigeneity and nativism” into “immanent traditions.”
杜赞奇的这个研究方向值得关注:一个民族-国家的建构,可能是成功的,也可能是失败的(如本书所讲的满洲国)。建构成功,需要在民族、文化、历史、语言、风俗等方面的努力,并且要善于运用一切有效的“国族想象力”,否则,现实一变,建构所得,无论再精妙,都会分崩离析。在外...
评分杜赞奇的这个研究方向值得关注:一个民族-国家的建构,可能是成功的,也可能是失败的(如本书所讲的满洲国)。建构成功,需要在民族、文化、历史、语言、风俗等方面的努力,并且要善于运用一切有效的“国族想象力”,否则,现实一变,建构所得,无论再精妙,都会分崩离析。在外...
评分杜赞奇的这个研究方向值得关注:一个民族-国家的建构,可能是成功的,也可能是失败的(如本书所讲的满洲国)。建构成功,需要在民族、文化、历史、语言、风俗等方面的努力,并且要善于运用一切有效的“国族想象力”,否则,现实一变,建构所得,无论再精妙,都会分崩离析。在外...
评分杜赞奇的这个研究方向值得关注:一个民族-国家的建构,可能是成功的,也可能是失败的(如本书所讲的满洲国)。建构成功,需要在民族、文化、历史、语言、风俗等方面的努力,并且要善于运用一切有效的“国族想象力”,否则,现实一变,建构所得,无论再精妙,都会分崩离析。在外...
评分杜赞奇的这个研究方向值得关注:一个民族-国家的建构,可能是成功的,也可能是失败的(如本书所讲的满洲国)。建构成功,需要在民族、文化、历史、语言、风俗等方面的努力,并且要善于运用一切有效的“国族想象力”,否则,现实一变,建构所得,无论再精妙,都会分崩离析。在外...
Sovereignty and Authenticity pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024