图书标签: 历史 新清史 海外中国研究 满族 中国近代史 路康乐 民族主义 民族-国家
发表于2024-06-15
Manchus and Han pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024
China's 1911-12 Revolution, which overthrew a 2000-year succession of dynasties, is thought of primarily as a change in governmental style, from imperial to republican, traditional to modern. But given that the dynasty that was overthrown—the Qing—was that of a minority ethnic group that had ruled China's Han majority for nearly three centuries, and that the revolutionaries were overwhelmingly Han, to what extent was the revolution not only anti-monarchical, but also anti-Manchu?
Edward Rhoads explores this provocative and complicated question in Manchus and Han, analyzing the evolution of the Manchus from a hereditary military caste (the "banner people") to a distinct ethnic group and then detailing the interplay and dialogue between the Manchu court and Han reformers that culminated in the dramatic changes of the early 20th century.
Until now, many scholars have assumed that the Manchus had been assimilated into Han culture long before the 1911 Revolution and were no longer separate and distinguishable. But Rhoads demonstrates that in many ways Manchus remained an alien, privileged, and distinct group. Manchus and Han is a pathbreaking study that will forever change the way historians of China view the events leading to the fall of the Qing dynasty. Likewise, it will clarify for ethnologists the unique origin of the Manchus as an occupational caste and their shifting relationship with the Han, from border people to rulers to ruled.
Edward J. M. Rhoads is professor of history at the University of Texas at Austin. He is the author of China's Republican Revolution: The Case of Kwangtung, 1895-1913.Winner of the Joseph Levenson Book Prize for Modern China, sponsored by The China and Inner Asia Council of the Association for Asian Studies
作者中文功底还是很深厚的,史料也很到位,关于此书看过的最好评论是狄宇宙写的。对照汉译本,就某章的个别“foreigners”被翻译成“列强”这一点,我再也不敢相信汉译的海外汉学了……
评分细节很多,但没有对满汉关系与清朝灭亡的关联提出什么新解释
评分将满族构建认同与满汉关系问题延展到清朝最末期,与欧柯接续而又有分歧,强调满族/满人形成的政治性。最早确有皇太极溯源语言文化和神话,但盛清时更多表现为八旗分区驻防、朝廷恩宠、社会隔离、文化差异(服装、语言、不缠足)职业差异(世袭旗兵或不经科举当官)而形成军事职业共同体,基于政治权力与精英封闭循环,旗制亦逐渐和满人概念交缠而旗满一体,相应地非旗/满的汉人精英亦逐步塑造双方认同。晚清改革触动旗人利益,汉族精英多次提出旗人优待与宗亲权力过大问题,但慈禧奕匡载沣均未全心意推动清理,最终授予激进革命党口实,暴力革命中权力诉求亦夹杂排满情绪,也是在革命中满族/满人概念确立于民族/族群歧异。民国后为接管清代疆域而优待清室、五族共和,亦进一步确立满人为族之念,至PRC方以基于自我认同之划分确立狭隘的满族。
评分考试临近,加上书过期了,只好囫囵吞枣地速读了前两章,幸好买了中文版,等考完了再看。
评分考试临近,加上书过期了,只好囫囵吞枣地速读了前两章,幸好买了中文版,等考完了再看。
摘要:路康乐著《满与汉》面世以来,广受好评。作者以“满”“汉”对立的视角得到了学界的甚高评价,但他忽视对概念的界定,遗漏满汉之外的其他族群和将满汉完全对立致有失真。该书的研究内容与所选研究时段明显分离,透露出模糊性而不便读者理解。自盖博坚并不确定地称该书为...
评分摘要:透过族群关系,路康乐提出了一系列问题:谁是满,谁是汉?义和团运动后革命党人是怎样批评满人的?在满人统治中国两百多年后,满汉到底有多大的区别?清政府是怎样处理这些批评的?满汉畛域是否有所弥合?关于汉满关系,清廷到底是有所作为或是无所作为而导致精英与之分...
评分——读(美)路康乐著《满与汉:晚清到民国初期的族群关系与政治权力,1861—1928》 中央民族大学管理学院 吴磊 徐永志 摘要:美国学者路康乐所著《满与汉:晚清到民国初期的族群关系与政治权力,1861—1928》一书,运用“民族—社会”的视角,着重分析了清末民初政治变革背景...
评分摘要:路康乐著《满与汉》面世以来,广受好评。作者以“满”“汉”对立的视角得到了学界的甚高评价,但他忽视对概念的界定,遗漏满汉之外的其他族群和将满汉完全对立致有失真。该书的研究内容与所选研究时段明显分离,透露出模糊性而不便读者理解。自盖博坚并不确定地称该书为...
评分1911年的辛亥革命终结了大清朝近三百年的国祚,但是满族统治者并不是没有做过努力,在庚子之乱之后,朝廷实行了新政,不过最后仍归于失败,大清朝在革命者的呐喊声中倾倒了。现在史学界讨论比较多的是历史应不应该给清政府一些时间和机会,让它将改革进行下去,也许中国的历史...
Manchus and Han pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024