The Structure of Scientific Revolutions pdf epub mobi txt 電子書下載 2024

☆☆☆☆☆
簡體網頁||繁體網頁

Thomas S. Kuhn

University Of Chicago Press

1996-12-15

212

USD 13.00

Paperback

9780226458083

圖書標籤: 科學哲學哲學科學 Kuhn 科普 Scientific Revolutions Structure

喜歡 The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 的讀者還喜歡

下載链接在页面底部

點擊這裡下載

facebook linkedin mastodon messenger pinterest reddit telegram twitter viber vkontakte whatsapp 複製鏈接

想要找書就要到小哈圖書下載中心

twxs8.cc

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本頁

你會得到大驚喜!!

发表于2024-06-20

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions epub 下載 mobi 下載 pdf 下載 txt 電子書下載 2024

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions pdf epub mobi txt 電子書下載 2024

圖書描述

Since the publication of this book in 1962, Kuhn's writings (and many of his ideas, such as "paradigm shift") have been highly influential in academic and popular discourse. This book is must-reading for anyone studying the history and philosophy of science specifically, or cultural or technological change generally.

Since Kuhn does not permit truth to be a criterion of scientific theories, he would presumably not claim his own theory to be true. But if causing a revolution is the hallmark of a superior paradigm, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions has been a resounding success.

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 下載 mobi epub pdf txt 電子書

著者簡介

Thomas Samuel Kuhn (surname pronounced /ˈkuːn/; July 18, 1922 – June 17, 1996) was an American physicist who wrote extensively on the history of science and developed several important notions in the sociology and philosophy of science.

圖書目錄

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions pdf epub mobi txt 電子書下載

想要找書就要到小哈圖書下載中心

twxs8.cc

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本頁

你會得到大驚喜!!

用戶評價

評分☆☆☆☆☆

對我頗有影響的書

評分☆☆☆☆☆

對我頗有影響的書

評分☆☆☆☆☆

數年前在哥大科學史方法論課上讀過，本學期因中國科學史課重讀

評分☆☆☆☆☆

Jan 2016二刷，簡直不知道兩年前自己一刷這本書的時候到底在看什麼。

評分☆☆☆☆☆

從人文學科的角度思考Kuhn對“範式”的界定很有意思。Kuhn認為科學的發展不是綫性積纍，而是範式轉移；範式之間不存在優劣之分，而是反映瞭人類在特定曆史語境下對世界不同的認知。這背後的曆史觀也是當代人文學科的基本假設。但換個角度看，用paradigm來描述人文學科似乎又不太妥當。科學的新範式一旦形成，就相應生成瞭一係列待解決的問題。Kuhn把科學傢的任務描述為"puzzle-solving"，想方設法證實或證僞現存的假設。而對人文學科來說，發現和提齣問題的過程本身就是睏難的。人文學界似乎沒有某個範式的影響可以大到提齣universal的問題。人文學者挑戰現存範式的熱情往往大於應用某個範式的熱情，這是好事，但其實也是個緻命的問題。